Proposals for upcoming labor negotiations between the University of California and UAW Local 2865 —which represents graduate student employees in the UC system—face a vote today.
The vote will likely determine the course of upcoming talks with the university that will lead to a new contract. A second measures asks for graduate students to approve giving the union negotiating board authority to call a strike, shall talks break down.
Negotiations will commence May 1 before the current contract with the university expires September 30.
UAW Local 2865 Executive Board President Christine Petit declined to comment on the specifics of proposals. She said terms in the proposals have been made available to union members, but are not public information.
“These latest proposals are based off of surveys that members fill out, as well as priorities coming out of the last negotiations,” she said.
Yet, while voting continues, critics within the union allege there are issues of transparency which challenge the integrity of the vote.
“There is a vote to give the union’s bargaining team the authority to call a strike, if necessary, and to approve the union’s initial bargaining demands,” former union official Scott Armstrong said via e-mail. “The union is having the vote basically without allowing the people voting to know what they are voting on!”
Armstrong said the union has not been held accountable enough to union members who have seen stagnating wages in the past ten years.
“They don’t try hard enough for higher wages,” he said. “ It’s much easier to bargain for things that sound good … the union might sit better if no one knows what is going on.”
He added that concessions made by the university granting childcare subsidies for graduate employees and other benefits were not substantial enough, despite a five percent wage increase the first year of the latest contract.
But Petit said the gains made by the union are not negligible.
“We’ve gotten substantial wage increases since we unionized,” she said. “Five percent is nothing to balk at.”
First year graduate student Mark Dewit who voted today, said he felt he was properly informed about the two measures from friends he has in the union. He added that union members made themselves available to members who wanted to know more about the proposals, in addition to collecting comments and data through the petition.
“They took input in that regard,” he said. “I was pretty well briefed on the outlines of what they’re going for.”